Skabelon:TV ratings/doc: Forskelle mellem versioner

Content deleted Content added
Fra en-wiki.
(Ingen forskel)

Versionen fra 12. okt. 2020, 21:17

All ratings should be cited with a reference, preferably not an embedded link.

Usage

Professionelle vurderinger
Anmeldernes vurdering
KildeVurdering
RogerEbert.com4/5 stjerner[1]
The Hollywood Reporter9/10[2]

Only add a rating if you cite it with a reference.

Instructions

The template is not to be a substitute for a section in paragraph form, since a review can not be accurately boiled down to a simple rating out of five stars or other numeric score. If an article is lacking a reception section in prose, but the information is presented in table format, the |noprose=yes parameter can be used to tag the article as needing a reception section in prose.

This template is generally the first element after the heading for the section on Reception, Critical reception, Reviews, or something similar. The template should not be used in place of a reception section.

The reviews should be listed alphabetically in the Reviews field. The information in the reviewer field should be the name of the source. Don't forget to wikilink to the relevant article.

The information in the score field should be the rating given in the review (e.g. 4/5). The rating should use the same format as in the review, to accurately portray the score of the review. For star ratings you should use the star rating template; for example, entering {{Rating|4.5|5}}, will render: 4.5/5 stjerner.

For reviews at Rotten Tomatoes it is convenient to use "RT=" in the template.

For reviews at Metacritic it is convenient to use "MC=" in the template.

Please note that the minus sign character () is not the same thing as a hyphen (-).

After the rating should be the citation of the source of the review. Per Wikipedia:Citing sources do not add reviews without a citation. This means a properly formatted footnote, in most cases providing the author, date, and source, along with an external link if available. Do not use an embedded link with no information (e.g. link) as this promotes link rot and is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policy on embedded links. If you must use an embedded link, be sure to manually provide a full citation in the article's References section per Wikipedia:Citing sources.

Usage

{{TV ratings
| title =
| subtitle =
<!-- Aggregate scores -->
| MC = 
| RT =
| aggregate1 = 
| aggregate1score = 
| aggregate2 = 
| aggregate2score = 
| aggregate3 = 
| aggregate3score = 
<!-- ... -->
<!-- Reviewers -->
| rev1 =
| rev1score =
| rev2 =
| rev2score =
| rev3 =
| rev3score =
<!-- ... -->
<!-- Article needs reviews expanded into prose -->
| noprose = <!--yes-->
}}

Parameters

Required fields:

rev#
The name of the reviewer. Too many is not advised, except in appropriate circumstances. For instance, a particularly popular or long-running series, which has several prominent reviews over decades' time.
rev#score
The rating given by the reviewer.

All of the following fields are optional:

title
Can be used to provide a custom title for the table, otherwise, it will default to "Professional ratings".
subtitle
Used to add additional text before the collapsible section. This is necessary to add if want a longer title, as long titles via the "title" parameter will not center correctly.
width
Sets the width of the table; default is 24.2em.
MC
Metacritic score.
aggregate#
Name of a review aggregator.
aggregate#score
The rating given by the review aggregator.
noprose
Should only be used for articles that do not have a Reception section summarizing the reviews. If set to yes, will categorize articles into Category:Articles with TV ratings that need to be turned into prose.
RT
Rotten Tomatoes score.

Example

For example, entering

{{TV ratings
| MC = 75/100<ref name="Meta">{{cite web|url=https://www.metacritic.com/tv/hillary/season-1|title=Hillary Season 1|publisher=Metacritic|accessdate=6 March 2020}}</ref>
| RT = 73%<ref name="RT">{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/hillary/s01|title=Hillary: Season 1|publisher=Rotten Tomatoes|accessdate=6 March 2020}}</ref>
| rev1 = ''[[RogerEbert.com]]''
| rev1score = {{Rating|3.5|4}}<ref name="Roger Ebert">{{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/hillary|title=Hillary|publisher=RogerEbert.com|last=Tallerico|first=Brian|accessdate=6 March 2020}}</ref>
| rev2 = ''[[Star Tribune]]''
| rev2score = {{rating|3|4}}<ref name="StarT">{{cite web|url=http://www.startribune.com/documentary-hillary-sets-out-to-prove-the-polarizing-political-figure-is-likable-enough/568278822/|title=Documentary 'Hillary' sets out to prove the polarizing political figure is likable enough|newspaper=Star Tribune|last=Justin|first=Neal|accessdate=6 March 2020}}</ref>
}}

will render

Professionelle vurderinger
Samlet vurdering
KildeVurdering
Metacritic75/100[1]
Rotten Tomatoes73%[2]
Anmeldernes vurdering
KildeVurdering
RogerEbert.com3.5/4 stjerner[3]
Star Tribune3/4 stjerner[4]


and generate the following footnotes with the sources:

  1. ^ "Hillary Season 1". Metacritic. Hentet 6 marts 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1-vedligeholdelse: Dato automatisk oversat (link)
  2. ^ "Hillary: Season 1". Rotten Tomatoes. Hentet 6 marts 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1-vedligeholdelse: Dato automatisk oversat (link)
  3. ^ Tallerico, Brian. "Hillary". RogerEbert.com. Hentet 6 marts 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1-vedligeholdelse: Dato automatisk oversat (link)
  4. ^ Justin, Neal. "Documentary 'Hillary' sets out to prove the polarizing political figure is likable enough". Star Tribune. Hentet 6 marts 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1-vedligeholdelse: Dato automatisk oversat (link)

Template data

Dette er denne skabelons TemplateData-dokumentation, som bruges af VisualEditor og andre værktøjer.

TV ratings

This template creates a table with reviews for television. Only add a rating if you cite it with a reference. The template is not to be a substitute for a section in paragraph form.

Skabelonparametre

Denne skabelon foretrækker blok-formatering af parametre (en parameter per linje).

ParameterBeskrivelseTypeStatus
First reviewerrev1

The name of the first reviewer.

Strengpåkrævet
First reviewer's ratingrev1score

The rating given by the first reviewer.

Strengpåkrævet
Second reviewerrev2

The name of the second reviewer. More reviewers can be added with parameters in the format rev[#] (the next one would be rev3). It is recommended to include no more than 10 reviews, but more can be added in exceptional circumstances.

Strengvalgfri
Second reviewer's ratingrev2score

The rating given by the second reviewer. More ratings can be added with parameters in the format rev[#]score (the next one would be rev3score). It is recommended to include no more than 10 reviews, but more can be added in exceptional circumstances.

Strengvalgfri
Table titletitle

A custom title for the table, replacing "professional ratings".

Strengvalgfri
Table subtitlesubtitle

Additional text before the collapsible section. This is necessary to add if you want a longer title, as long titles in the "title" parameter will not work right.

Strengvalgfri
Table widthwidth

The width of the table.

Strengvalgfri
Metacritic scoreMC

The Metacritic score. Appears under the "Aggregate scores" header.

Strengvalgfri
Article lacks prose sectionnoprose

Set this to "yes" to flag articles that have an album ratings table without a prose reviews section.

Strengvalgfri
Rotten Tomatoes scoreRT

The AnyDecentMusic? score. Appears under the "Aggregate scores" header.

Strengvalgfri
First review aggregatoraggregate1

The name of the first review aggregator.

Strengvalgfri
First review aggregator's ratingaggregate1score

The rating given by the first review aggregator.

Strengvalgfri
Second review aggregatoraggregate2

The name of the second review aggregator.

Strengvalgfri
Second review aggregator's ratingaggregate2score

The rating given by the second review aggregator.

Strengvalgfri

See also