Fuente Magna og Pokotia-monolitten: Forskelle mellem versioner
Content deleted Content added
Glenn (diskussion | bidrag) |
Glenn (diskussion | bidrag) ændret i henhold til diskussion |
||
Linje 1:
{{POV}}
'''Fuente Magna''' er en sten[[bovle]] som blev fundet af en [[bonde]] i [[1950'erne]] ved [[Tiahuanacu]] i [[sydamerika]]. Fra den gang og til ca. år [[2000]] er den blevet antaget for at være et svindelnummer. Fra år 2000 blev Fuente Magna antaget for at være [[autentisk]]
Autenciteten opfattelse deles ikke af andre videnskabsfolk. '''Pokotia-[[monolit]]ten''' blev fundet [[4. januar]] [[2002]].
Inskriptionerne på Fuente Magna og den 2 meter høje Pokotia-monolit
<ref>[http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/archeol/fuentema.htm The Decipherment of the Fuente Magna Bowl] Citat: "...Dr. Winters believed that researchers had been unable to read the writing because they refused to compare Proto-Elamite and Proto-Sumerian writing with other writing systems used in 3000-2000 BC...Using the phonetic values of the Vai script, Dr. Winters has been able to decipher the Indus Valley and Linear A writing...By comparing the Fuente Magna scripts and symbols with the Vai writing, Winters found many matches. Then after referring to several published works on the Sumerian language and writing system, e.g., C.S. Ball, Chinese and Sumerian (London, 1913), and John A. Halloran, Sumerian Lexicon, ( http://www.sumerian.org/sumer/ex.htm ), he was able to decipher the Fuente Magna writing..."</ref>
bl.a. som [[kileskrift]], [[proto-elamite]] og [[proto-sumerisk]] af Clyde Winters. Kileskrift og semitisk hænger sammen med [[Mesopotamisk]]e [[tradition]]er. Inskriptionerne er blevet tidsbestemt til ca. [[3500 f.Kr.]] - [[3000 f.Kr.]] (den [[Akkadisk]]e, [[Sumerisk]]e tidsperiode).
{{Sydamerika-geostub}}
Line 12 ⟶ 17:
==Eksterne henvisninger==
<References/>
▲*[http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_8.htm World Mysteries - Strange Artifacts, Fuente Magna - Rosetta Stone of Americas] Citat: "... The Fuente Magna has not been shown in [[Bolivia]] until year [[2000]]. It was considered false, until we began the investigations...It contains two texts, one in [[Kileskrift|cuneiform]] and another [[Semitiske sprog|Semitic language]] of possible Sinaitic extraction cuneiform influences...Chronologically, this leads us to the [[3500 f.Kr.|3500]]/[[3000 f.Kr.|3000 B.C.]], the [[Sumerisk|Sumerian]]/[[Akkadisk|Akkadian]] [[tidsperiode|period]]...Monolith of Pokotia...the monolith from an early Tiahunaco`s period that nobody doubts is not a fake...Semitic and cuneiform writings in [[Tiahuanco]] - this has enormous significance...Chapter 3 - Decipherment...During [[Inka|Inca]] (Sumerian: En-ka "Great Lord") times..."
▲*[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Academy/8919/Fuente.html The Decipherment of the Fuente Magna Bowl By Clyde A. Winters, Ph.D.]
*[http://www.geocities.com/webatlantis/fuentemagna.htm Fuente Magna. Rosetta stone of the Americas] Citat: "...It is clear that civilisation in ancient South America is much older and more extensive than has been previously recognised..."
*[http://www.altarcheologie.nl/index.html?connections/characters_01.htm Ancient Archaeology - List of remarkable archaeological finds] Citat: "...The possible relation between the [[Yonaguni]]/[[Okinawa]] writing, the Indian clay tablet, the finds at [[Peru]], and the Phoenician end result leads to the conclusion that this is another piece of evidence pointing to a common cultural origin..."
| |||