Fuente Magna og Pokotia-monolitten: Forskelle mellem versioner

<ref>[http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_8.htm World Mysteries - Strange Artifacts, Fuente Magna - Rosetta Stone of Americas] Citat: "... The Fuente Magna has not been shown in [[Bolivia]] until year [[2000]]. It was considered false, until we began the investigations...It contains two texts, one in [[Kileskrift|cuneiform]] and another [[Semitiske sprog|Semitic language]] of possible Sinaitic extraction cuneiform influences...Chronologically, this leads us to the [[3500 f.Kr.|3500]]/[[3000 f.Kr.|3000 B.C.]], the [[Sumerisk|Sumerian]]/[[Akkadisk|Akkadian]] [[tidsperiode|period]]...Monolith of Pokotia...the monolith from an early Tiahunaco`s period that nobody doubts is not a fake...Semitic and cuneiform writings in [[Tiahuanco]] - this has enormous significance...Chapter 3 - Decipherment...During [[Inka|Inca]] (Sumerian: En-ka "Great Lord") times..."</ref>

<ref name="Winters">[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Academy/8919/Fuente.html The Decipherment of the Fuente Magna Bowl By Clyde A. Winters, Ph.D.]</ref>

 

Inskriptionerne på Fuente Magna og den 2 meter høje Pokotia-monolit er blevet antaget at være eller forsøgt fortolket