European Rail Traffic Management System: Forskelle mellem versioner

Content deleted Content added
wiki
Linje 30:
== Diskussion ==
Ifølge en artikel i [[International Railway Journal]] har ERTMS mange udfordringer foran sig. F.eks. fortælles det at ERTMS er "fuld af selvmodsigelser" og at der er mere tiltro til ERTMS udenfor Europa end indenfor.
<ref>Archive backup 2010: [http://web.archive.org/web/20100504085123/www.railjournal.com/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=810 railjournal.com: Yet more ERTMS challenges ahead] Citat: "...NEVER before – at least not in my 30-odd years as a railway journalist – has a [[Togkontrolsystem|train control system]] aroused such passion and heated debate as ERTMS...ERTMS is full of contradictions...Hase also raised the subject of [[OpenETCS|Open ETCS]], a DB initiative backed by operators in Britain, France, Italy and the Netherlands to adopt [[open-source]] software to reduce the cost of on-board equipment. Hase said DB has set itself a very tough unit target cost of [euro]60,000...Hase said that it took 15 years for Germany to get back to having one signalling handbook following German reunification, so it is an illusion to try to have one set of operating rules for the whole of Europe..."</ref>
Sverige havde blandede erfaringer i 2012 med ERTMS.<ref>[http://ing.dk/artikel/132363 21. sep 2012, ing.dk: Svenskerne snubler i umoden ERTMS-teknologi]</ref>
 
== ERTMS i Danmark ==