Kernekraft: Forskelle mellem versioner

Content deleted Content added
m Gendannelse til seneste version ved Necessary Evil, fjerner ændringer fra 93.167.172.178 (diskussion | bidrag)
m bot: indsæt skabelon autoritetsdata
Linje 175:
* [http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2003/june/pbmr.htm Science in Africa, 2003: South Africa's nuclear programme. Tom Ferreira] Citat: "...Indeed a feather in the cap for South Africa considering that Eskom is internationally regarded as the leader in the field of the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) technology...If a fault occurs during reactor operations, the system, at worst, will come to a standstill and merely dissipate heat on a decreasing curve without any core failure or release of radioactivity to the environment. In fact, the PBMR's inherent safety is fundamental to the cost reduction achieved over other nuclear designs..."
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4631737.stm 29 June, 2005, BBC News: Cost of nuclear 'underestimated'] Citat: "...According to British Energy and British Nuclear Fuels, the cost of nuclear generation is between 2.2 and 3.0p/kWh. But the NEF says that this figure is probably a severe underestimate, with the real cost being somewhere between 3.4 and 8.3/kWh...At a cost of 3.0-4.0p/kWh for offshore and 1.5-2.5/kWh for onshore production, wind is a far cheaper option than nuclear, the NEF claims..."
 
{{autoritetsdata}}
 
[[Kategori:Kernekraft| ]]