Kernekraft: Forskelle mellem versioner

! '''CO₂-ækvivalenter'''<br />2008<br />gCO2/kWh<ref name="parliamentuk">[https://web.archive.org/web/20171105214034/http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn268.pdf Carbon footprint of Electricity Generation], postnote October 2006, no. 268, Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology, UK</ref>

! '''CO₂-ækvivalenter'''<br />2006<br />gCO2/kWh<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20110718134952/http://www.stormsmith.nl/publications/Energy%20from%20Uranium%20-%20July%202006.pdf stormsmith.nl: Energy from uranium ] Citat: "...Nuclear electricity generated from ores with a grade of 0.15% U, the world average at this moment, has a specific carbon dioxide emission of nearly 90-140 grams CO2 per kilowatt-hour, depending on accounting the energy debt or not...Emissions of other GHGs..."</ref>

! '''CO₂-ækvivalenter'''<br />2010<br />gCO2/kWh<ref>Video: [http://video.ted.com/talks/podcast/NuclearDebate_2010_480.mp4 jun, 2010, TED: Debate: Does the world need nuclear energy?] ([http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/debate_does_the_world_need_nuclear_energy.html lav-opløsning]) To opponenter fremlægger og har hver deres CO₂-grafer. Her anvendes professor ved [[Stanford University]] [http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/ Mark Z. Jacobsons] tal aflæst fra tiden 9:47 med CO₂ fra både livscyklus og fossil-CO₂-udslip mens man venter på godkendelse og kraftsværkbyggeriet. Se [https://web.archive.org/web/20160315190524/http://wwwweb.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/0911SIEPR.pdf stanford.edu: "A Plan For a Sustainable Future" side 11] og [https://web.archive.org/web/20170525195526/http://wwwweb.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/ReviewSolGW09.pdf Side 7, tabel 3: Mark Z. Jacobson: Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security]</ref>