Diskussion:Turmalin
2,352 Gemstone Images not worth being added as a link?
redigérHi friends, you could be the one who help me with whitelisting my URL www.realgems.org. Since December 2008 Vsmith & Co. (USA) have deleted all my external links so that all gemstone-interested Wiki users worldwide (! - except Germany) cannot find my collection of faceted gemstones (and their rough versions) any more... From July 2008 until December 2008 all my link additions (to my own, educational and non-profit website) were not regarded as spam!!!
Since a few days I have followed the instruction of an English Wiki admin to create something worthy for Wikipedia so that my URL can be whitelisted again. So I created these articles on German Wiki BECAUSE GERMAN WIKI HAS WHITELISTED MY URL BECAUSE THEY HAVE SEEN THAT MY COLLECTION OF MORE THAN 2000 IMAGES IS WORTH BEING LINKED AT WIKIPEDIA: Tugtupite, Jeremejevite, Benitoite and added some data to Red Beryl. What else can I do to reach a worldwide whitelisting?
More infos here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spam_blacklist#Realgems.org_-_a_useful_website_for_Wiki_users.3F
Kind regards, Mike / Realgems.org F.N. Berg 2. mar 2009, 23:34 (CET)
Krystalsystemer
redigérJeg lavede en meget lille undersøgelse af ganske få smykkesten. Der står ikke et ord om krystalsystemet, som stenen tilhører. Burde det ikke lige nævnes? Og så lige et link til krystalstruktur, hvor krystalsystemerne er omtalt. Måske skulle krystalsystem have sit eget opslag? For så kunne man lettere vise, at et krystalsystem kan optræde i flere former (f.eks. det kubiske, der optræder som kuber og oktaedre og flere andre). Problemet er måske at finde ordentlige illustrationer. Ditlev Petersen (diskussion) 4. feb 2014, 21:42 (CET)