Den kreative klasse: Forskelle mellem versioner
Content deleted Content added
Fnielsen (diskussion | bidrag) →Virkeligheden: Slettede afsnit: Hvad har Marilyn Monroe at gøre med det moderne begreb? |
|||
Linje 45:
:"The creative class failed consistently across multiple statistical tests to explain any urban income or job growth" (s. 22);
:'''Whyte''': "Glaeser takes on its statistical basis, Florida's bohemian index. Using data from 242 cities provided by Florida, Glaeser, an economic geographer, found that the overall "bohemian effect" on economic growth in America was driven by two of the 242: Las Vegas and Sarasota, Fla. "Excluding those cities," he wrote, meant that "bohemianism becomes irrelevant. "Given that I will never believe that either Las Vegas or Sarasota stand as stellar examples of bohemianism, I will draw another conclusion," he wrote: "skilled people" – not artists, by any measure – "are key to urban success." "</ref>.
== Litteratur ==
|