Walpot
Medlem siden 4. april 2016
Content deleted Content added
Zoizit (diskussion | bidrag) |
Walpot (diskussion | bidrag) No edit summary |
||
Linje 8:
First, if you have an account at one of the other wikipedia, you would know to signs your posts on talk pages (User talk/Benutzer Diskussion) and that you do not delete the talk pages (User talk/Benutzer Diskussion)--- greeting [[Bruger:Zoizit|Zoizit]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Zoizit|diskussion]]) 19. maj 2016, 12:47 (CEST)
Dear Zoizit,
to write it as clear as possible - as long as I use wikipedia (in German and English) - it simply was not necessary to discuss a simple addition of a bibliographic note on a discussion board. There are three options when confronted with such an addition: 1) the reference is misleading > delete, 2) the reference is false/fake > delete, 3) the reference exists and fits to the topic > it's correct, it's a contribution for it gives more information than the article inclued before and no administrator may delete it for the reason of "personal opinion". Mr Winckelmann stated that my contributions were not "neutral": a bibliographic note is beyond being neutral or not - it's simply there. The one and only point seems to be that I posted notes refering to my academic work. It's not the bible - everyone may add other works which may lead further in relation to the topic of the article. So - what is actually the problem?
Regards,
[[Bruger:Walpot|Walpot]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Walpot|diskussion]]) 19. maj 2016, 13:22 (CEST)
| |||