Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Linje 147:
:[[Bruger:Rmir2|mvh Rmir2]] biased towards me, please don`t bann.
:it seems to be based on the opinion of the Danish users have no choice but to agree with [[Bruger:Vrenak|Vrenak]] for the three photos in the article itself. --[[Bruger:Yasnodark|Yasnodark]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Yasnodark|diskussion]]) 16. jun 2016, 14:3222 (CEST)
:I included to the article select three images, as suggested by [[Bruger: Vrenak | Vrenak]] or I need to discuss it on this page?--[[Bruger:Yasnodark|Yasnodark]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Yasnodark|diskussion]]) 16. jun 2016, 14:32 (CEST)
:At the same time, I hope you will not mind if the full version of the galleries will be presented on this page, so that anyone with a strong desire reader could understand what is actually talking about. What is a bone of contention and the subject of conversation. --[[Bruger:Yasnodark|Yasnodark]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Yasnodark|diskussion]]) 16. jun 2016, 14:3222 (CEST)-
 
:[[Bruger:PerV|mvh Per (PerV)]]!!!I don`t understand, why remove, you talked about the 3 photos? I fulfilled only your conditions, on which bank may be involved, please explain what it. Maybe something I do not understand. I added exactly as number photos as you said,--[[Bruger:Yasnodark|Yasnodark]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Yasnodark|diskussion]]) 16. jun 2016, 14:22 (CEST)
'''PLEASE DO NOT CONTINUE THE DEBATE HERE. THE DEBATE IS GOING ON ELSEWHERE. I WILL RESPOND THERE.''' [[Bruger:Rmir2|Rmir2]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Rmir2|diskussion]]) 16. jun 2016, 16:27 (CEST)
:Sorry, thank you.--[[Bruger:Yasnodark|Yasnodark]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Yasnodark|diskussion]]) 16. jun 2016, 14:32 (CEST)-