Versionen fra 28. okt. 2006, 23:06 redigér Metalindustrien (diskussion \| bidrag) Autopatruljerede 33.334 edits No edit summary		Versionen fra 29. okt. 2006, 13:31 redigér fjern redigering Metalindustrien (diskussion \| bidrag) Autopatruljerede 33.334 edits mNo edit summary Gå til næste forskel →
Linje 1: For at holde listen fra at blive for stor bør du flytte inaktive evalueringer til det nuværende [[Wikipedia:Evaluering#Arkiver\|arkiv]]. Fjern venligst følgende slags evalueringer fra listen: To keep down list bloat, you are invited to move inactive requests to the current [[Wikipedia:Peer review#Archive links\|archive link]]. Please remove only the following kinds of requests from the list: Efterspørgsler som ikke er passende som evalueringer, for eksempel ønsker om hjælp til at modvirke hærværk, til at løse uoverensstemmelser mellem brugere eller finde ophavsretsproblemer, bør fjernes omgående, hvilket er i alles interesse, da personen der efterspurgte en evaluering højst sandsynligt ikke vil få respons på problemerne her. Informer personen der ønskede en evaluering på vedkommendes diskussionsside om fjernelsen og begrundelsen, og forsøg at anbefale en bedre side til efterspørgslen, for eksempel for hærværk [[Wikipedia:Hærværk]] eller [[Wikipedia:Landsbybrønden]] for andre slags uoverensstemmelser. Requests that aren't appropriate for peer review, for instance requests for help in containing vandalism, resolving an edit war, or detecting a copyvio, should be removed promptly, in the interest of the requester, since he/she is unlikely to get adequate response to them here. Please drop a note on the requester's talk page to inform them of the removal and the reasons for it, and try to recommend a better page to list the request, for instance for vandalism [[Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress\|Vandalism in progress]], for editing disagreements [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment\|Requests for comment]], and for suspected copyvio [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems\|Copyright problems]]. Evalueringer som har modtaget en eller flere svar og som ikke har vist nogen aktivitet i 14 dage (to uger) bør fjernes medmindre det er tydeligt bemærket at nogen arbejder på nogle af de problemer som nævnes i evalueringen. Requests that have received one or more responses and have not shown any activity for a period of 14 days (two weeks) should be removed. Evaluering som er ældre end en måned eller uden datoer bør fjernes medmindre det er tydeligt bemærket at nogen arbejder på nogle af de problemer som nævnes i evalueringen. Requests older than a month or without dates should be removed. Artikler som er blevet nomineret som [[Wikipedia:Kandidater til anbefalede artikler\|kandidater til anbefalede artikler]] bør også fjernes. Articles that have gone on to be listed as [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates\|featured article candidates]] should also be removed. If you feel that an article you posted needs more comments and suggestions from peer review, it's probably too soon to list it on FAC. <!-- Requests that have attracted comments from other people, and where the original poster has not responded to these comments within a week, should also be removed. Requesting and then ignoring comments tends to discourage potentially valuable input, and peer review needs to attract more, not less, comments from reviewers. However, please be '''careful''' when you decide to remove a listing for this reason! Requesters are encouraged to respond on the peer review page, so as to keep everyone informed of the progress of the article; nevertheless, before removing an apparently unresponsive poster, please check first whether they have perhaps responded somewhere else: on the article's talk page, on the reviewer's talk page, or by editing the article appropriately. -->▼ [[en:Wikipedia:Peer review/Request removal policy]] ▲Requests that have attracted comments from other people, and where the original poster has not responded to these comments within a week, should also be removed. Requesting and then ignoring comments tends to discourage potentially valuable input, and peer review needs to attract more, not less, comments from reviewers. However, please be '''careful''' when you decide to remove a listing for this reason! Requesters are encouraged to respond on the peer review page, so as to keep everyone informed of the progress of the article; nevertheless, before removing an apparently unresponsive poster, please check first whether they have perhaps responded somewhere else: on the article's talk page, on the reviewer's talk page, or by editing the article appropriately. [[~~Category~~Kategori:Wikipedia ~~editorial validation~~]]

Wikipedia:Evaluering/Fjernelsespolitikken: Forskelle mellem versioner