Content deleted Content added
Rmir2 (diskussion | bidrag)
No edit summary
Nyt afsnit: →‎My "case" II
Linje 142:
:By the way: we have started some years ago to improve the references on Danish wiki. In too many years we did not make an effort on this, but now it is different. Just for Your information.
:I hope that You will understand and accept this answer. best regards [[Bruger:Rmir2|Rmir2]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Rmir2|diskussion]]) 20. maj 2016, 12:04 (CEST)
 
== My "case" II ==
 
Dear Rmir2,
 
sorry to bother you again: but what you wrote is absolutely misleading. You and your wiki-mates' point of view was until now: posting of "litteratur" notes is ok besides done by the author himself ("self-promotioon"). Now you state that these kind of information has (generally?) to be posted in the discussion forum so that you're able to proof it. So: what's the policy rule now? To cut off discussion here: if a group of wikipedia administrators do think first of any reason why contribution schould NOT be done and NOT, THAT and HOW they should be done, it's a closed world of people who over-estimate their abilities to control (and to proof) knowledge. Do you have an idea of my trust in your ability to proof a German article on a specialized field of Early Modern Military History? Yes, you're right. It's 0,0. I have no problems with deletions that are well explained and communicated - but general deletion due to personal opinions and obviously discontent that contributors do trust in their own works - that's Kindergarten...
 
Cheers,
 
[[Bruger:Walpot|Walpot]] ([[Brugerdiskussion:Walpot|diskussion]]) 20. maj 2016, 14:05 (CEST)