Hej RJB-nl. Jeg har opdaget, at dine redigeringer er i strid med vores politikker og normer.
Jeg vil derfor henlede din opmærksomhed på, at tests, nonsens, jokes, chikane, reklamer og fejlagtige oplysninger ikke er velkomne. Måske var det ikke tilsigtet. I så fald vil jeg foreslå dig at læse følgende links med gode råd for at undgå gentagelser.


Hvis du har lyst til at eksperimentere, brug Sandkassen.

På forhånd tak, Trade 11. nov 2011, 15:53 (CET)


Dear Trade! Since you are - obviously - unaware of the great and lasting shame that User Rodejong has brought to nl-wiki, I will forgive you for your utterly arrogant remark above. I would wish, though, that you would apply the same vigorousness in rejecting the amount of nonsense that Rodejong is adding to the Danish site. His contributions to Dutch lemma`s on da-wiki are as poor as were his additions to Danish lemmata on nl-wiki. Meanwhile he succeeded in torturing almost anyone. And he was blocked indefinetly from nl-wiki on account of several suck puppets he used, in order to continue his ill presence! RJB-nl 11. nov 2011, 17:26 (CET)

Please refrain from attacking other users; Trade, in the above comment, is doing little more than follow standard procedure. Furthermore, if you have specifik complaints to lodge against Bruger:Rodejong I'd suggest that you cease attacks on him on various talk pages, as this approach does not have any other effect than to aggravate and irritate. If Rodejong is guilty of sock puppetry, as you claim, the user will not be dissuaded from further edits by discussion; if he is innocent, there's all the more reason to cease these attacks immediately. Instead I suggest you present any evidence you have on this page where it may be carefully reviewed by Wikipedias administrators, who will also be able to take appropriate action. Kind regards, --Medic (Lindblad) 11. nov 2011, 18:46 (CET)
Your kind regards seem somewhat hollow, after you've found it appropriate to bully me. Rodejong is bad news on all WP-sites. On DA-wiki he is (claiming to be Dutch, and - therefore - authorative) adding nonsense by the meter. On NL-wiki he was doing the same. Claiming that he - living in Denmark - was the most exclusive expert on Danish items, he produced loads of nonsense.
But - ofcourse - his key aim was to write many happy reports about the JW's. Which he did. After being corrected he dedicated his nl-wikilife to the greatest obstruction of - literaly - everyone who had opposed him.
Nonetheless I wish you the best of luck, in all your efforts to defend someone who has caused a tremendous Exodus on nl-wiki, someone who seems to be unable to write one proper Dutch sentence, someone who pushes his particular views with vigour, someone whome we call - no pun intended - a blood sucker. RJB-nl 11. nov 2011, 20:23 (CET)
The mainstay of my reply can be found here; however, I'd like to restate that nothing I've said has been intended as a bullying, nor am I defending (or accusing) anyone, yet. All I'm trying to convey is that discussions be held in a calm, polite tone, and that this matter be resolved by a review of facts, not conjecture, rumour or speculation. Hence, as I've stated before, please present any facts you have uncovered, and let that be the basis of any action or judgment. Kind regards, --Medic (Lindblad) 11. nov 2011, 21:15 (CET)