Diskussion:Easley High School
Sletningsforslag: Easley High School
[redigér]
Se evt. på Wikipedia:Sletningsforslag
Jeg vil mene, at en tilfældig amerikansk high school ikke har notabilitet på den dansk sprogede Wikipedia. --Harthacnut (diskussion) 27. jul 2015, 19:42 (CEST)
- Wikipedia is a neutral, information-filled encyclopedia about places all over the world. Just because this is the Danish Wikipedia does not mean that we should only have articles about minor Danish topics. This is about me, as an American who has been learning Danish for 3 years, I came to this site to increase its information on American topics, especially minor ones. It upsets me that this is being labeled for deletion. NativeCat (diskussion) 27. jul 2015, 19:52 (CEST)
- What I'm trying to say is, in my personal opinion, if something is notable on the English Wikipedia, then theoretically, there should be articles about it on all of the other Wikipedias as well. NativeCat (diskussion) 27. jul 2015, 19:54 (CEST)
- See also the extra 3 references I found online. Now there's no excuse to delete this article. NativeCat (diskussion) 27. jul 2015, 20:00 (CEST)
Neutral: Dawiki and enwiki are two different projects with each their notability rules. It was discussed on Wikipedia:Landsbybrønden/Kriterier for notabilitet - andre wikier whether the existance of an article on another language version should make an article automatically notable and as I said then, it should not. Each language version decides its own notablility rules. However, it is not relevant which country it is in. We are not Denmark's Wikipedia but Wikipedia in Danish.
- Sarrus (d • b) d. 27. jul 2015, 20:06 (CEST)
Behold: I think it's relevant, but I do also think it would be a great idea to focus more on the more important articles from the English Wiki, such as terms and major turist attractions. I agree with Sarrus. Pyrros (diskussion) 27. jul 2015, 21:39 (CEST)- Behold jeg er enig med Pyrros ---Zoizit (diskussion) 28. jul 2015, 01:10 (CEST)
- Behold: ... forudsat at den bliver udvidet til at beskrive hvorfor den er notabel, dvs, lidt mere end bare at den eksisterer og er stor. - Nico (diskussion) 28. jul 2015, 07:40 (CEST)
- Behold Hvis artiklen udbygges, kunne der blive en ganske fin artikel ud af det. --Sorenhk (diskussion // projekter // bidrag) 28. jul 2015, 22:31 (CEST)
Slet - der er intet i artiklen, der overbeviser mig om dens notabilitet eller opslagsværdi. Rmir2 (diskussion) 29. jul 2015, 08:48 (CEST)- Slet - Kilderne dokumenterer ingen nobilitet (ej heller at skolen skulle være den største). --Kontoreg(Henvendelse) 31. jul 2015, 07:58 (CEST)
 | Konklusion: |