Brugerdiskussion:Biscuit-in-Chief
Velkommen til min diskussionsside
Arkiver |
Min fejlagtige tilbagerulningRediger
Hej Biscuit. Jeg forstår godt, at du ikke forstår denne tilbagerulning jeg har lavet, for det gør jeg heller ikke. Jeg erindrer end ikke, at jeg har foretaget den 😅
Jeg tror, jeg må være kommet til at klikke på gendan-knappen ved et uheld, da jeg kiggede en eller anden log igennem. Det er desværre sket et par gange for mig før gennem årene. Jeg må finde en måde at børnesikre tilbagerulningsværktøjet. Beklager ulejligheden. -- InsaneHacker ⚖️🕊️ (💬) 17. okt. 2022, 23:47 (CEST)
- Jeg har nu ved at kigge i min browserhistorik identificeret, hvor jeg har fejlklikket. Det ærgrer mig, at jeg ikke fik øje på fejlen da den skete (sad og skiftede mellem flere forskellige WP-faner, hvilket nok er grunden til at jeg ikke opdagede det) for så havde jeg selvfølgelig rettet mig selv. -- InsaneHacker ⚖️🕊️ (💬) 17. okt. 2022, 23:50 (CEST)
- Helt i orden, det sker . — Biscuit‑in‑Chief :-) (skriv til mig – bidrag) 17. okt. 2022, 23:55 (CEST)
The Signpost: 1 January 2023Rediger
- Interview: ComplexRational's RfA debrief
- Technology report: Wikimedia Foundation's Abstract Wikipedia project "at substantial risk of failure"
- Essay: Mobile editing
- Arbitration report: Arbitration Committee Election 2022
- Recent research: Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement in talk page disputes
- Featured content: Would you like to swing on a star?
- Traffic report: Football, football, football! Wikipedia Football Club!
- CommonsComix: #4: The Course of WikiEmpire
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Redigering af Regeringen Mette Frederiksen IIRediger
Hejsa Jeg kan se, at du har rettet i siden for Regeringen Mette Frederiksen II og skrevet under den parlamentariske situation, at der er tale om en de facto flertalsregering. Jeg har rettet det tilbage til en mindretalsregering, idet det er den formelle parlamentariske situation. Det kan godt ske, at den materielt kan agere som en flertalsregering, men det er den formelt set ikke. 77.33.6.215 4. jan. 2023, 11:59 (CET)
The Signpost: 16 January 2023Rediger
- Special report: Coverage of 2022 bans reveals editors serving long sentences in Saudi Arabia since 2020
- News and notes: Revised Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines up for vote, WMF counsel departs, generative models under discussion
- In the media: Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again
- Technology report: View it! A new tool for image discovery
- In focus: Busting into Grand Central
- Serendipity: How I bought part of Wikipedia – for less than $100
- Featured content: Flip your lid
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2022
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 4 February 2023Rediger
- From the editor: New for the Signpost: Author pages, tag pages, and a decent article search function
- News and notes: Foundation update on fundraising, new page patrol, Tides, and Wikipedia blocked in Pakistan
- Disinformation report: Wikipedia on Santos
- Op-Ed: Estonian businessman and political donor brings lawsuit against head of national Wikimedia chapter
- Recent research: Wikipedia's "moderate yet systematic" liberal citation bias
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Organized Labour
- Tips and tricks: XTools: Data analytics for your list of created articles
- Featured content: 20,000 Featureds under the Sea
- Traffic report: Films, deaths and ChatGPT
The Signpost: 20 February 2023Rediger
- In the media: Arbitrators open case after article alleges Wikipedia "intentionally distorts" Holocaust coverage
- Disinformation report: The "largest con in corporate history"?
- Tips and tricks: All about writing at DYK
- Featured content: Eden, lost.
- Gallery: Love is in the air
- From the archives: 5, 10, and 15 years ago: Let's (not) delete the Main Page!
- Humour: The RfA Candidate's Song
The Signpost: 9 March 2023Rediger
- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propoganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
The Signpost: 20 March 2023Rediger
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
The Signpost: 20 March 2023Rediger
- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?